Research output

Publications

Sort by: Date | Author | Title

Hakli, R. (2014). Groups Can Lie. Abstract from Collective Intentionality IX, Bloomington, Indiana, United States. http://www.indiana.edu/~socrates/CI9/
Fischer, K. & Seibt, J. (2023). Recipient Design, Sociomorphing and Experienced Sociality. In R. Hakli, P. Makela & J. Seibt (Eds.), Social Robots in Social Institutions - Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2022: Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2022 (pp. 528-537). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA220654
Druckman, D., Adrian, L., Damholdt, M. F., Filzmoser, M., Koszegi, S. T., Seibt, J. & Vestergaard, C. (2021). Who is Best at Mediating a Social Conflict? Comparing Robots, Screens and Humans. Group Decision and Negotiation, 30(2), 395-426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-020-09716-9
Damholdt, M. F., Olesen, M. H., Nørskov, M., Hakli, R., Larsen, S., Vestergaard, C. & Seibt, J. (2016). A generic scale for assessment of attitudes towards social robots: The ASOR-5. In J. Seibt, M. Nørskov & S. S. Andersen (Eds.), What Social Robots Can and Should Do - Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2016/TRANSOR 2016: Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2016 / TRANSOR 2016 (Vol. 290, pp. 45-47). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-708-5-45
Damholdt, M. F., Vestergaard, C. & Seibt, J. (2020). Testing for ‘anthropomorphization’: a case for mixed methods in Human-Robot Interaction. In C. Jost, B. Pévédic, T. Belpaeme, C. Bethel, D. Chrysostomou, N. Crook, M. Grandgeorge & N. Mirnig (Eds.), Human-robot interaction : evaluation methods and their standardization (pp. 203-227). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42307-0
Damholdt, M. F., Vestergaard, C. & Seibt, J. (2020). Ascribing gender to a social robot. In M. Nørskov, J. Seibt & O. S. Quick (Eds.), Culturally Sustainable Social Robotics - Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2020: Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2020 August 18–21, 2020, Aarhus University and online (pp. 247-256). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA200921
Damholdt, M. F. (2022). Negative attitudes towards robots in the young and old. Abstract from ISG 2022 world conference of gerontechnology, Daegu, Korea, Republic of.
Damholdt, M. F., Vestergaard, C., Quick, O. S. & Seibt, J. (2025). Ethical Deliberation in the Presence of Robots: Heterophenomenological Access to Sociality Experiences in Human-Robot Interaction. In O. Palinko, L. Bodenhagen, J.-J. Cabibihan, K. Fischer, S. Šabanović, K. Winkle, L. Behera, S. S. Ge, D. Chrysostomou, W. Jiang & H. He (Eds.), Social Robotics - 16th International Conference, ICSR + AI 2024, Proceedings (pp. 304-318). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-3522-1_27
Contiero, R., Nørskov, S., Damholdt, M. F., Ulhøi, J. P., Lazazzara, A. & Seibt, J. (2023). Robots in personnel selection: the role of interviewer’s competence ratings and interviewee’s fairness perception. Paper presented at The 20th conference of the
Italian Chapter of Association for Information Systems , Torino, Italy.
Adrian, L., Vestergaard, C. & Druckman, D. (2023). Robot Mediation: The Source of Creative Solutions. Paper presented at IACM 2023, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Adrian, L., Druckman, D. & Vestergaard, C. (2026). Impacts of a Robot Mediator on the Negotiation Process. Group Decision and Negotiation, 35(2), Article 37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-026-09995-8