Research output

Publications

Sort by: Date | Author | Title

Seibt, J., Borggreen, G. R., Fischer, K., Hasse, C., Liu, H.-Y. & Nørskov, M. (2018). Working with and Alongside Robots: Forms and Modes of Co-Working. In M. Coeckelbergh, J. Loh, M. Funk, J. Seibt & M. Nørskov (Eds.), Envisioning Robots in Society –Power, Politics, and Public Space, Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2018 / TRANSOR 2018, (pp. 125-132). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-931-7-125

Rodogno, R. (Accepted/In press). Who's afraid of nudging by social robots? In J. Seibt, R. Hakli & M. Nørskov (Eds.), Robophilosophy: Philosophy of, for, and by social robotics MIT Press.

Druckman, D., Adrian, L., Damholdt, M. F., Filzmoser, M., Koszegi, S. T., Seibt, J. & Vestergaard, C. (2021). Who is Best at Mediating a Social Conflict? Comparing Robots, Screens and Humans. Group Decision and Negotiation, 30(2), 395-426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-020-09716-9

Seibt, J., Nørskov, M. & Andersen, S. S. (Eds.) (2016). What Social Robots Can and Should Do: Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2016/TRANSOR 2016. IOS Press. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications Vol. 290

Damholdt, M. F., Christina, V., Kryvous, A., Smedegaard, C. V. & Seibt, J. (2019). What is in three words? Exploring a three-word methodology for assessing impressions of a social robot encounter online and in real life. Paladyn: Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 10(1), 438-453. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2019-0034, https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2019-0034

Hakli, R. & Miller, K. (2013). What are Collective Preferences?. http://www.helsinki.fi/enso 

Seibt, J. & Rodogno, R. (2019). Understanding Emotions and Their Significance through Social Robots, and Vice Versa. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 23(3), 257-269. https://doi.org/10.5840/techne2019233104

Damholdt, M. F., Vestergaard, C., Nørskov, M., Hakli, R., Larsen, S. K. & Seibt, J. (2020). Towards a new scale for assessing attitudes towards social robots: The attitudes towards social robots scale (ASOR). Interaction Studies, 21(1), 24-56. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.18055.fle

Seibt, J. (2017). Toward an Ontology of Simulated Social Interaction: Varieties of the 'As-If' for Robots and Humans. In R. Hakli & J. Seibt (Eds.), Sociality and Normativity for Robots: Philosophical Inquiries into Human-Robot Interactions (pp. 11-39). Springer Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53133-5

Seibt, J. (2016, Nov 1). This is the time for robophilosophy.

Nørskov, S. & Ulhøi, J. P. (2020). The use of robots in job interviews. In T. Bondarouk & S. Fisher (Eds.), Encyclopedia of electronic HRM (pp. 208-213). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110633702-032

Ulhøi, J. P. & Nørskov, S. (2022). The emergence of social robots: Adding physicality and agency to technology. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 65, Article 101703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2022.101703

Seibt, J., Vestergaard, C. & Damholdt, M. F. (2021). The Complexity of Human Social Interactions Calls for Mixed Methods in HRI: Comment on “A Primer for Conducting Experiments in Human-Robot Interaction” by G. Hoffman and X. Zhao. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction, 10(1), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3439715

Rodogno, R. & Nørskov, M. (2019). The automation of ethics: The case of self-driving cars. In C. Hasse & D. M. Søndergaard (Eds.), Designing robots, designing humans (pp. 55-72). Routledge. https://www.statsbiblioteket.dk/au/?locale=da#/search?query=recordID:"ebog_ssib036276462"

Damholdt, M. F., Vestergaard, C. & Seibt, J. (2020). Testing for ‘anthropomorphization’: a case for mixed methods in Human-Robot Interaction. In C. Jost, B. Pévédic, T. Belpaeme, C. Bethel, D. Chrysostomou, N. Crook, M. Grandgeorge & N. Mirnig (Eds.), Human-robot interaction : evaluation methods and their standardization (pp. 203-227). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42307-0

Nørskov, M. (2016). Technological Dangers and the Potential of Human-Robot Interaction: A Philosophical Investigation of Fundamental Epistemological Mechanisms of Discrimination. In M. Nørskov (Ed.), Social Robots: Boundaries, Potential, Challenges (pp. 99-121). Routledge.

Seibt, J., Vestergaard, C. & Damholdt, M. F. (2020). Sociomorphing, Not Anthropomorphizing: Towards a Typology of Experienced Sociality. In M. Nørskov, J. Seibt & O. S. Quick (Eds.), Culturally Sustainable Social Robotics: Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2020 August 18–21, 2020, Aarhus University and online (pp. 51-67). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA200900

Rodogno, R. (2016). Social Robots, fiction, and sentimentality. Ethics and Information Technology, 18(4), 257–268.

Seibt, J. & Rodogno, R. (Eds.) (2019). Social Robots, Emotions, and Social Cognition: Conceptual, Empirical, and Ethical Perspectives. The Polanyi Society. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology Vol. 23 No. 3

Nørskov, M. & Nørskov, S. (2020). Social robots and recognition. Philosophy & Technology, 33(1), 5-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00353-y

Nørskov, M. (Ed.) (2016). Social Robots: Boundaries, Potential, Challenges. Routledge. Emerging Technologies, Ethics and International Affairs

Skewes, J. C., Amodio, D. & Seibt, J. (2019). Social robotics and the modulation of social perception and bias. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 374(1771), Article 20180037. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0037

Ulhøi, J. P. & Nørskov, S. (2018). Social robotics: Adding agency and physicality to technology. Abstract from International Research Conference Robophilosophy 2018, Wien, Austria.

Hakli, R. & Mäkelä, P. (2015). Social Ontology. In R. Audi (Ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy (3 ed., pp. 999-1000). Cambridge University Press.

Yamazaki, R., Nishio, S., Ishiguro, H., Minato, T., Nørskov, M., Ishiguro, N., Nishikawa, M. & Fujinami, T. (2012). Social Inclusion of Senior Citizens by a Teleoperated Android: Toward Inter-generational TeleCommunity Creation. Paper presented at IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Vila Moura, Portugal. http://emotion.inrialpes.fr/people/spalanzani/WorkshopIROS12/FW1_main.pdf

Damholdt, M. F. & Vestergaard, C. (2022). Sociale robotter behandles som om de har et køn - og det kan være problematisk. Videnskab.dk.

Ryuji, Y., Nishio, S., Ishiguro, H., Nørskov, M., Ishiguro, N. & Balistreri, G. (2012). Social Acceptance of a Teleoperated Android: Field Study on Elderly’s Engagement with an Embodied Communication Medium in Denmark. In S. Sam Ge, O. Khatib, J.-J. Cabibihan, R. Simmons & M.-A. Williams (Eds.), Social Robotics: 4th International Conference, ICSR 2012, Chengdu, China, October 29-31, 2012. Proceedings (Vol. 7621, pp. 428-437). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34103-8

Seibt, J., Hakli, R. & Nørskov, M. (Eds.) (2014). Sociable Robots and the Future of Social Relations: Proceedings of Robo-Philosophy 2014. IOS Press. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications No. 273

Yamazaki, R. & Nørskov, M. (2014). Self-alteration in HRI. Poster session presented at Going Beyond the Laboratory, Delmenhorst, Germany. http://www.uni-oldenburg.de/sozialwissenschaften/ast/forschungsprojekte/robo-com/veranstaltungen/going-beyond-the-laboratory/gbtl-poster-session/#poster

Contiero, R., Nørskov, S., Damholdt, M. F., Ulhøi, J. P., Lazazzara, A. & Seibt, J. (2023). Robots in personnel selection: the role of interviewer’s competence ratings and interviewee’s fairness perception. Paper presented at The 20th conference of the
Italian Chapter of Association for Information Systems , Torino, Italy.

Displaying results 1 to 30 out of 75

Activities

Questionaires

Videos

Conference research output

Revised 04.04.2022

Marco Nørskov

School of Culture and Society

Robophilosophy and Integrative Social Robotics

Research output

Publications